In the Netherlands, non-competition bans (non-simultaneous or concurrent) are permitted for issues such as switching to a new employer and bringing the former company`s customers closer together. Unreasonable clauses can be struck down in court.  Non-competition agreements are different from non-disclosure agreements (NOAs) that generally do not prevent an employee from working for a competitor. Instead, NOA prevents the employee from disclosing information that the employer considers proprietary or confidential, such as. B customer lists, underlying technology or product information under development. A non-compete agreement is a contract in which a worker promises to no longer compete with an employer after the end of the employment period. These agreements also prohibit the employee from passing on proprietary information or secrets to other parties during or after the employment. The applicability of non-compete agreements in the state of Florida is quite common. Some law firms develop their law firms around these agreements and represent the workers, employers and potential new employers of a worker currently bound by a non-compete agreement. The agreement should not be too broad and is generally difficult to implement if it takes more than two years.  However, Florida courts rarely refuse to impose a non-competition clause because of its length or geographic scope.
Instead, courts are required, under Florida law, to enter into a broad or long-term unauthorized non-compete agreement with “blue pencil” to do so under Fla. Stat.  Even if the agreement is part of a general employment contract, there is a possibility of prior infringement on the part of an employer. As a result, the non-competition clause of the treaty will no longer apply. However, recent appels court jurisprudence in Florida has eroded the usefulness of the previous injury defence.  Lyons v. Multary justified a general preference for non-demand over non-competition agreements as “much more draconian weapons” and found that a non-competition agreement was not valid if a non-invitation agreement had been sufficient to protect the company`s interests.